ekpyrotic-gamble: how many mosquitoes might be living in parallel-universes?

Ever since I read Brian Greene’s elegant universe way back I can’t help but
be intrigued by the esotheric thought of extra dimensions.

I read your contribution in achtphasen und it looks like you spend a lot of
time thinking it through.

Now, you are saying that we might devastate large regions of space in those
other dimensions with our MBHs made by CERN. I’m wondering what could be
the potential consequences for our part of the universe here ? In the
braneworld scenario, dismissed by CERN, strings, which appear open ended to
us, may in reality by attached to branes of the other dimensions.

Even if it sounds speculative, could it be that the values of the seemingly
arbitrarily set constants of nature are being determined in the other
dimensions, like a scalar field?
What if we accidentally alter those constants or enter another period of
repulsive gravity? - scary thoughts !

————–

Thank you! You are the first one to react upon my ‘personal’ and quite ‘credibility-risking’ worries about our ‘culture’s schizophrenic arrogance having on one hand theories about extra-dimensions connected to parallel-universes but having on the other hand NO hesitations to eventually disturbing, shattering or even destroying those eventually existing parallel-universes by might-be ignorantically but absolut intentionally smashing exactly those eventually existing extra-dimensions together.

The ultrasmall in our universe would be the ultralarge in parallel-universes - but experimentators ‘audiences’ was told only mosquito-allegories, which even in our universe are only half of the truth but - considering the eventuality, that parallel-universe’s dimensions are intentionally crashed one into another could be named as ekpyrotic-gamble. How many mosquitoes might be living in parallel-universes?

Employees at CERN surely are absolute normal fulfillers/employees, i am sure and certain, they could be my friends, if i’d know one. But their elite and their ‘high-priests’ as Randall, Kaku and others, they must perfectly be aware of the fact, that they are gambling around not only with Earth beeing existant for future generations to come, but also with whole universes. (If their own theories are right.)

Sure it is very interesting to find out, if those seemingly crazy ideas of parallel-universes would eventually be true and if there really are parallel-universes …
but consequence of those theories, which haven’t been developped not until the nineties of last century (after the conceptualization of LHC) should have shown, that high-tech machinists( but nevertheless absolute archaical) ‘technique’ of smashing together must be the wrong way to find out what makes existence existent.

But on the contrary: All theorist of string- and multiversum-philosophies are enthousiastically waiting upon proves that their respective theories might be describing nature correct.

With just a little bit more wider-spread intelligence and responsability, cosmologists themselves would have shut down LHC as soon as possible and changed towards refining humanity’s ability of detecting collisionproducts which occure in natures own safe mode in aboundance by cosmic rays hitting on Earth and the Moon.

Not to modify ones equipment although whole populations of parallel-universes are at stake (and eventually Earth also) perfectly fits to worst european tradition of conquerring, devasting and slavering other ‘worlds’, which - before discovery and ‘christianization’- were much more in harmony with the surrounding nature, as after their detection.

Indeed, i am a fan of hight-technology! But i would like it to be used cautious and responsible and not as mass-products for people kept ignorant with high-tech tools loosing thus all connection to nature’s given reality and loosing compassion with those, that will live in later periods, and thus are unable to defend their interest on their own.

I would like our culture using high-technology to help Earth becoming a ‘paradise’, where no one have to starve of hunger - making the deserts flourish AND producing there big amounts of energy by covering Earth’s desert areas with checkerboard-like roofs with solar-panels on the upper-side and dew-collectors at the down-side.
So energy-production in aboundance and enflourishment of huge nearly infertile landscapes would go along.

Such technological investment in the poorest regions of the world would bring good ‘fruits’ - such investment would be a kind of compensation for european crimes against humanity and nature since the so called ‘era of discoveries’ … and further there would be huge acreages to place auger-like detectors. Same on the moon.

Observing how eventually existing parallel-universes are crashing together and what kind of particles are resulting of such crashes is indeed very interesting! But i can’t any longer resist to name intentionally making eventually existing parallel-universes crashing together as what it really is: it is a crime risking whole parallel-universes existance specially when done intentionally.

Intenionally making those eventually existing parallel-universes crash one into another 10′000′000′000′000′000′000′000′000′000 times denser than it happens in natures own safe way in Earth’s stratosphere and on the surface of the moon, isn’t but a foolish criminal gamble with those eventually existing parallel-universes and our own existence, too.

This is the stuff i am worried about! Black-Holes and Strangelets are dangerous, of course - but in my eyes, they are mainly a symbolon to explain people, WHY this kind of experimentation could bring their small private existences in small private danger …
… mankinds psyche is still the same since archaic times.

I can’t understand why multiversum-theorists aren’t opposing LHC but on the contrary enthousistically advancing this eventually universe-smashing fraudulence … thus by staying silent, they become guilty, and Earth the hostage of their haste to verify their curiosities.

Sorry for writing so loudly, about my most profound worry, these days, which in my eyes could be the treshold of mankinds evolution. There won’t be no future without compassion.

Marc Fasnacht