QuarkGluonPlasmatic-states of matter, as they are believed to have been existent only about 1/1000th part of a second after the (so called) initial Big-Bang, should have been subsisting only before the inflation of space-time ‘took place’ and the annihilation of most parts of matter proceeded, if physical-mainstream theories on the origin of our spacetime (and it’s matter) are correctly describing nature.

The origin of cosmic rays is still unclear!

As 99.9% of all cosmic-rays have energies ‘only’ in the BeV-range, which corresponds to the rest-mass of ‘our’ ‘ordinary’ baryonic-matter, it is reasonable to consider the possibility, that a today unknown ‘agent’ exists (or existed) in ‘outer’ space-time (in the period of annihilation), which has the capacity to transform normal baryonic-matter in radiation.

Such an ‘agent’ could indeed become recreated by TeV-scaled collider-experiments here on Earth and thus could become dispersed in our solarsystem, where such an agent obviously didn’t exist since 4.5 billions of years.
About 1/1000 of this unknown ‘agent’ would probably stay in Earth, and thus could transform Earth’ matter in radiation.

Aside of this ‘Cosmic-Ray-Scenario’ two main ‘groups of risks’ are remaining:

  1. A first ‘group of risks’ is independent of any extradimensional effects to eventually become true:
    negatively charged StrangeQuark-HyperNuclei and Vacuum-Bubble-Instabilities, Magnetic-Monopoles and SUSY-particles which all bear the non-quantified (non-quatifiable) risk of tranforming Earth’s matter or space-time itself.
  2. And a second ‘group of risks’, which depends on the supposed existence of ‘large’ extradimension
    (where large means someting about maximum a tenth of a milimeter)
    which are thought to be curled into the matter-constituant particles of nuclei: the Quarks.

!!! All risk-scenarios depending on the latter group, have been calculated and thought about only after the planning and decision- and financing-processes to build the L.H.C.!!!

Microscopic-black-holes, wormholes and further my personal worry of ekpyriotic (big-bang-like) explosions share this common aspect:
they are depending on the eventuality, that the infinities of one universe could be compactified/curled/warped in the smallest ‘particles’ of other universes and vice-versa.

As non curled dimensions are to be understood as infinite in length and/or duration in the respective ‘parallel-universes’, but are supposed to be curled/warped/compactified into the smallest parts of our normal baryonic-matter in ‘our’ universe …
and, reciprocally the same:
‘Our’ infinit dimensions would be curled in smallest parts of parallel-universe’s ‘matter’[*], we have to conclude, that small and big is only a question of perspective.

*All* risk-negations, the experimentator CERN and it’s experiment-proponents have stated, are based on the ‘’fact‘’, that ‘’particles‘’, which could initiate cataclytic catastrophic transformations of Earth’s matter, would, if remaining stable, be neutrino-sized small and thus should be considered as harmless.

I hope, this argumentation will be proven true! But i fear, that into the smallest parts of our normal baryonic matter there could be concentrated the whole of parallel universes energy.

Exactly here is my personal main worry, which i had in my heart, before i ever heard of the eventual possibility of micro-black-hole creationing in TeV-ranged colliders:

“What seems to be the uttermost ‘’smallest'’, could indeed be enormously ‘’big'’”.

The difference between ‘big’ and ’small’ could indeed be only a result of the ‘chosen’ perspective:

  • - either ‘looking’ ‘down’ towards matter (which would be constituted by ‘warped/curled’ infinities of other universes)
  • - or ‘looking’ ‘up’ to the infinities of our spacetime-dimensions (which then respectivly would be ‘warped/curled’ into parallel-universes matter),

and therefore the smallest parts of our matter could be connected with the enormous energies of entire parallel-universes.
Thus catstrophical effects on our shared ‘mezzo-cosmical’ ‘reality‘ could indeed liberate energies of big-bang-like explosions without any infringement of the second law of thermo-dynamics, as the energies of whole universes could accidentally become released, as soon as two curled extradimensions would collide super-precisly ‘head-on’ at the L.H.C..

One of experimentators favourite answers on the layman-question, why collision-experiments at L.H.C. are needed is: to solve the conundrum of the origin of mass itself.

The matter of our reality consists mainly of emptyness, charges and fields and - concentrated in the nuclei - the unsolved question what gives matter mass.

If mass isn’t existing otherwise but as ‘our’ reception of ‘curled’ extradimensions of parallel-universes, then it is likely, that there could be a treshold, from where on matter transforming chain-reactions would become initiated, or (mini-)big-bang-like explosions could happen.

Marc Fasnacht

[*]
(Those parallel-universe’s ‘matter’ doesn’t need to have any ressemblance with our matter.)

2010-06-28 | achtphasen | 11:30:40 | Email | 3 comments




 

Comment from: achtphasen [Member] Email
Das Szenario der kosmischen Strahlung:

Materiezustände wie das QuarkGluonPlasma gab es natürlicherweise nur Bruchteile einer Tausendstel Sekunde nach dem sobenannten Urknall.

Also VOR der 'Inflation' der Raumzeit und VOR der Annihilationsphase

Die Herkunft der kosmischen Strahlung ist ungeklärt.

99,9% der kosmischen Strahlung hat weitaus geringere Energie als in den TeV-energetischen Beschleunigern RHIC, Tevatron und LHC zu head-on-Kollision gebracht wird. (Nämlich nur BeV-Niveau.)

Das Masse-Energie-Aequivalent von von 99,9% der kosmischen Strahlung entsprcht erstaunlicherweise der Ruhemasse normal-baryonischer Materie.

Das muss als Warnung verstanden werden, dass ein (heute noch unbekannter) Katalysator zur Transformation von Masse in Strahlung zumindest zu Beginn dieser Raumzeit existiert haben könnte.

Solch katalysatorisch wirksame 'Teilchen' könnten durch TeV-energetische Kollisionen in Beschleunigern auf der Erde wiedererschaffen und in unserem Sonnensytem verteilt werden.

'Missing Energies', wie bei RHIC bereits detektiert, könnten solch Materie transformierende 'Teilchen' sein.

Ob an Beschleunigern solche (bis dato durchaus rein hypothetische) Materietransformatoren erzeugt werden können, das ist absolut unerforscht.

Ob und wie rasch solche Katalysatoren messbare Effekte auf irdische Materie haben werden ist ebenso ungewiss ...
PermalinkPermalink 2010-06-28 | 18:20
Comment from: achtphasen [Member] Email
The Ekpyrotic Universe: Colliding Branes and the Origin of the
Hot Big Bang

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0103239
PermalinkPermalink 2010-06-28 | 18:24
Comment from: achtphasen [Member] Email

Unser 'sehr geehrter Herr Kannenberg' hat in seinem Schmuddelforum hier auf Ungenauigkeiten meiner Artikulation verwiesen:

Verfasst am: 29.06.2010, 10:18
Hallo zusammen,

für den stillen Mitleser, falls er hier liest:

Zitat:
Materiezusände wie das QuarkGluonPlasma gab es natürlicherweise nur eine Tausendstel Sekunde nach dem sobenannten Urknall.

Also VOR der 'Inflation' der Raumzeit und VOR der Annihilationsphase


Die Inflation fand rund 10^(-36) bis 10^(-32) Sekunden nach dem Urknall statt. Eine tausendstel Sekunde sind 10^(-3) Sekunden.

Die Zeiten, zu denen sich die Inflation ereignete, lassen sich verständlicher mit Planck-Zeiten (5*10^(-44) Sekunden) als mit solchen riesigen Exponenten beschreiben.


Freundliche Grüsse, Ralf


Wofür ich ihm hiermit danke.
Fasnacht
PermalinkPermalink 2010-06-29 | 11:23

This post has 1 feedback awaiting moderation...

*
* your email address will not be displayed
  your URL will be displayed