[EDIT May, 02, 2010] http://meltronx.com/lhcdatawide/lhc3.html doesn’t show any more 12 hours stats of energies and beam-ramping up and down activities! So there would another source be needed to further check out, if there are some correlations between activities at LHC and earth-quakes. Help in this topic would be very appreciated! Thank you. [/Edit]
The Beast says: 'set-up at 450 GeV, ramp to 3.5 TeV and dump at top energy' ... Will there occure more high magnitude earth-quakes due to butterfly-effects of LHC's oszillating gravito-magnetic field intensities?
@12:07:05(CET) http://meltronx.com/lhcdatawide/lhc1.html informs: ’set-up at 450 GeV, ramp to 3.5 TeV and dump at top energy’

Question is, if today one or some more high magnitude earth-quakes will occure, after the last few days, where there was none? This is transparent testing if our ‘idea’ on LHC as a strong gavitomagnetic pole on Earth inducing stronger earthquakes than normal. Such transparent and public testing of unthought side-effects would be experimentators own business. But as J. Engelen decided, that there wouldn’t be any risk operating LHC - the famous 0% - it remains up to the handfull of informed and interested ‘LHC-worried’ to test such might-existant correletaions.

Help observing the LHC-status is strongly apreciated, as i can not spend whole days watching the beast ramping energies up und dumping beams down.
Thank You!
LHC-performance of last 12 hours 29.04.2010 23h41(CET)
source of illustration: http://meltronx.com/lhcdatawide/lhc3.html

First conclusion: There are no gravito-magnetic butterfly-effects on earthquake energies stored in the faults detectable from LHC’s ramping energies up today, until now, 16h32CET.

LHC-performance of last 12 hours 30.04.2010 08h49(CET)
source of illustration: http://meltronx.com/lhcdatawide/lhc3.html
LHC-performance of last 12 hours 01.05.2010 00h39(CET)
source of illustration: http://meltronx.com/lhcdatawide/lhc3.html

t.i.w.i.p.

2010-04-29 | achtphasen | 12:29:51 | Email | 2 comments




 

Comment from: Alfred (9) [Visitor] · http://www.akademie-walheim.nl
Tja, Mr. Fasnacht!
Your predicted butterfly-effect in order to induce earthquakes is overrunning its own time, isn't it? What went wrong?

Alfred (not "Alf")
PermalinkPermalink 2010-04-30 | 01:12
Comment from: achtphasen [Member] Email
Collider-enthousiastic stultificator of kaese-crank-fraction doesn't realize that an open research is in no way a prediction. In this blog i only collect some status-massages of the beast. Energies up, energies down. If there is a correletion between earthquakes an energies at LHC, there should also be (might be less effective) correlation between RHIC ramping up and down energies.

Earthquakes with magnitude >5 are since 2005 significantly more often happening than ever before since comparable statistics are published by us-american seismological (nuclear-test-observating) institutions are publishing such data. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/quakes_all.php
PermalinkPermalink 2010-05-01 | 09:06

This post has 3 feedbacks awaiting moderation...

*
* your email address will not be displayed
  your URL will be displayed