Strangelet Scenario: 2010-2012

In 2010 CERN will begin colliding groups of 70 million lead hadrons at 287 tev, unpacking millions of quarks in each collision. Those quarks will be first accelerated at light speed, acquiring relativistic mass, becoming heavier strange quarks, the substance of a strange quark-gluon soup called a ‘strangelet‘. The strange liquid has the potential to become stable and start an ‘ice-9′ big-bang reaction. If that happens that effectively transforms the Earth into a pulsar.

During 2010 and 2011 as the LHC increases the potency and number of quarks it collides in its experiments, it will create greater quantities of atoms of strangelet liquid, called hyperons, made of up, down and strange quarks, which it has already produced in unexpected numbers at low energies, despite all their safety reports that said it would never produce them.

As quarks accelerate at c-speed, they acquire mass, because energy cannot go beyond light speed. Energy curls tiny vortices of space-time (Einstein’s definition of mass), making those quarks heavier. At light speed our protons made of up and down quarks (uud) will become strange quarks, converting the colliding protons into hyperons (usd particles, atoms of usd=strange liquid). Within the point of collision hyperons merge in pairs becoming dibaryons, which are stable and neutral and so they cannot be detected.

Thus dibaryons once formed, will fall to the center of the Earth, accreting matter as they form a growing ball of strange liquid. Most of them will explode in their path to the center of the Earth provoking mini-big bangs in the mantle, which will cause an increase in earthquake activity during the years 2010 and 2011. But some will arrive to the center of the Earth, where they will form a growing ball of ultradense strange liquid, which finally will crunch the Earth into a strange star. We will know this scenario’s end is closer, when we experience magnitude 9 earthquakes that kill hundreds of thousands of human beings.

Black Hole Scenario: 2013

In 2013 the LHC will accelerate protons and hadrons at maximal energy, colliding them at over 1 Pev,

producing heavy, bottom, charm and top quark-gluon liquid condensates, aka Higgs (connect to PDf or Higgs screen), possible substances of black holes. The quark-gluon soup it will produce will be far denser and attractive than strangelet liquid, hence the process of accretion of the Earth will be self-similar to the strangelet event but much faster.

Those collisions have the potential to create micro-black holes and top quark condensates (the real Higgs). The top quark condensates have properties similar to black holes, which according to Albert Einstein will not evaporate, rather convert matter (the Earth) into a 3 cm Black Hole or Frozen star.

A black hole is made of strings (the minimal components of quarks) which are the components of gluons and quarks. Their mathematical description is equivalent (a 5th dimensional world of strings is equivalent to a 4 dimensional world of quarks); which reinforces the idea that a black hole is a top quark star.

The LHC was created to produce massive quantities of top quarks since the Higgs and a top quark condensate are the same substance, (the Higgs was promoted as the new ‘God particle’ just to get more research resources, not allocated to study known-particles). It will not form black holes that evaporate. Since quarks don’t evaporate.

The black hole will not fall to the Earth but it will become the new, densest center of the Earth and the Earth will fall into LHC’s creation. The process will last a very short time. Some images might be captured on TV but most likely wherever we are, we will just feel a strong wind, and then a blast of attractive forces will crunch and kill us, as the Earth explodes into a Nova.

Published: March 10, 2010 | http://www.cerntruth.com/?p=50

2010-03-13 | achtphasen | 22:18:26 | Email | 9 comments




 

Comment from: ralfkannenberg [Visitor]
If this "theory" was correct, all these terrible things would already have happened to earth's moon. See "Review of Speculative “Disaster Scenarios” at RHIC", R.L. Jaffe, W. Busza, J. Sandweiss and F. Wilczek for details: "Review of Speculative “Disaster Scenarios” at RHIC", R.L. Jaffe, W. Busza, J. Sandweiss and F. Wilczek
PermalinkPermalink 2010-03-14 | 00:12
Comment from: luis sancho [Visitor] · http://www.cerntruth.com
it astonishes me how low is the mathematical IQ of the people at cern in things that truly matter such as:
- tax payer's money. They more than double the budget of their machine. THe scc at texas started with 4.2 billion $ and soon was 12 $... ts, ts, we are not in the cold war when anything goes. We are in a crisis.
- When they do probabilities. The 'we are still here' argument is totally flawed because CERN should calculate the probabilities of existence of dark matter and existence of planets where intelligent life has survived for the entire Galaxy, which is the ecosystem in which this planet survives or not. And it turns out that 96% of the galaxy is dark matter and dark energy, so dark matter conversions of planets into quark stars happen al the time. And it turns out there are billions of planets but we do not detect any sign of radio from Intelligent Life (Fermi paradox), only from quark stars. So planets must be disappearing eaten or converted by physicists into MACHOs of dark matter (strange stars and black holes) all the time.
But the human sheeple wants to believe you. It is the psychology of death. People at auschwitz believed what R.H. told them: that they were going to be desinfected and ran into the showers. People at Earth believes what R.H. tells them: that black holes have not yet eaten us so we MUST do them to solve that little 'error'. Truth always proves itself, unfortunately in this case prove might kill us.
www.cerntruth.com
PermalinkPermalink 2010-03-15 | 16:34
Comment from: ralfkannenberg [Visitor]
"People at auschwitz"

Hello Mr.Sancho,

do you like to tell us a little more what you think about this issue ? And what you think about jews, about holocaust and so on ?

You will find an interested auditorium !


By the way, two scientific issues:

1. It is not possible to estimate the number of intelligent populations in our galaxy, thus all your consequences mentioned above do not apply.


2. I am very interested to see how dark matter can be converted into quarks from a particle point of view - suddenly being able to interact by the strong force, the electromagnetic force and the weak force as well ...

And then, how very loosely coupled dark matter can be converted into ultra-dense quark stars ...


Best regards, Ralf Kannenberg
PermalinkPermalink 2010-03-16 | 11:23
Comment from: luis sancho [Visitor] · http://www.cerntruth.com
Mr. Ralf, it is a fact that there are almost a planet of the size of Jupiter in each star system and the more we look the more each system looks like Earth, and yet none shows intelligent life, not even robotic life. So something is happening to all those planets.
Further on, in the models of a fractal Universe, recently proved experimentally by the Sloan Survey there is no big-bang adn so the only form to account or the BG radiation aat 2.7k is if it is produced by graviitatinal redshifting by black holes. It can be calculated that a BH to produce that exacct BG radiation must have the MASS OF A MOON. So MOon machos that eat Moons must be happening all over the galaxy. It is an easy relatiionship: if stars give birth to black holes, the most common planetoid of the galaxy a moon, gives birth to a Moon Macho of dark matter that produces the BG radiation of the galaxy.
For more on this and the falsity of CERN's safety standards please consider my page on this issue:
http://www.cerntruth.com/?p=6
Regardig the manner in which technological societies which worship machines and weapons more than human life and culture provoke holocausts of which European nations hold an awesome record from the Spaniards in America to the British and French in colonial Africa to the Germans and now perhaps all together against mother earth, again consider this page from the same site:
http://www.cerntruth.com/?p=1
'The tragedies of history repeat themselves because nations don't learn from their past' M. Proust
PermalinkPermalink 2010-03-16 | 13:21
Comment from: ralfkannenberg [Visitor]
Hello Mr.Sancho,

nice ideas. Can you provide any publications about this ?

Still open questions to you contribution of 16:34:

(1) How can dark matter particles convert into baryonic and leptonic matter ?
(2) How can dark matter collapse into a quark star ?


We are in a scientific discussion, thus I do not see any reason in using politic and historic "assessments".

Best regards, Ralf Kannenberg
PermalinkPermalink 2010-03-16 | 17:29
Comment from: luis sancho [Visitor] · http://www.cerntruth.com
I believe Mr. Kannenberg that since Eddington proved Einstein's relativity studying the gravitational lensing of light there are thousands of papers in gravitational red shift, and the formula to calculate the fact that a black hole of the mass of the moon produce light at 2.7k is in any book on Relativity; the Fermi paradox has been around for more than 50 years. You can even read it in wikipedia. But of course, it is part of the psychology of death that instead of fighting our sickness which in this case is CERN, the victims prefer to deny for fear, this potential genocide. Psychologists talk of 3 reactions: denial, anger against the doctor and bargaining for a false salvation. In this case mankind has bargained with the perpetrators asking CERN for 'safety lies', like the absurd lie of cosmic rays, which have nothing to do with the quark-gluon soup that detonates quark stars...
www.cerntruth.com
PermalinkPermalink 2010-03-16 | 18:15
Comment from: ralfkannenberg [Visitor]
Hello Mr.Sancho,

why are you changing the topics ? You have written on March 15th, 16:34:

"so dark matter conversions of planets into quark stars happen al the time"

This is a very interesting topic and I want to know how this can work. For better understanding I have split the question into two parts - one on a particle level and one on a star formation level.

I do not question gravitational lensing and I do not question gravitational red shift, but I wonder how your transformation from dark matter into baryonic/leptonic matter - which would violate some conservation laws, thus addition to current theories is required - is done and how you want to collapse very loosely matter into an ultradense body.

And if there is literature for these issues I would appreciate if you provide the reference(s) to me.


"psychology of death"

To me it seems that a psychology of death is practised by people mixing up issues.


"for 'safety lies'"

Up to now only 2 spelling mistakes have been found in these publifications that you assess as "safety lies". I would appreciate if you are able to name further ones.


"like the absurd lie of cosmic rays"

According to my knowledge there is plenty of publication about cosmic rays, thus it will be helpful if you explain us why you assess them to be absurd.


Best regards, Ralf Kannenberg
PermalinkPermalink 2010-03-17 | 08:38
Comment from: luis sancho [Visitor] · http://www.cerntruth.com
Dear Sir:
In astrophysics there are 2 types of theories:
- Those done by true scientists of the Universe, astronomers who study directly the Universe and obey the scientific method with its constrains:
A) Experimental evidence B) causality in time C) scientific logic: you do science to explain phenomena observed; you do NOT invent first with your fantasy a phenomenon never observed that breaks the laws of science (Higgs particle, evaporating Black holes) and then you pretend it should exist because you can write it with mathematics. This is not science but science fiction.
- And so there are science fiction writers, nuclear physicists who pretend to apply the laws of the quantum world to the Universe without A) Experimental evidence (they are not observing the Universe but making bombs) B) causality in time and scientific logic (they break the laws of time, as Hawking does, pretending that black holes evaporate to the past, or as the cosmological big-bang does ignoring the laws of information, the fact that as Parmenides proved that something cannot come from nothing, or as Higgs does creating a new cosmic field never observed out of nothing, a scalar particle never observed out of nothing, a Higgs mechanism never observed that contradicts all the laws of momentum and matter)
How these science fiction writers impose their falsities? With dogmatic statements, money and marketing, power and machines.
Now you belong thoroughly like CERN people to 'science fiction writing' when you affirm as a 'matter of fact' without experimental proofs, contradicting all the logic of the Universe and inventing particles that dark matter are wimps. Wimps are equations that describe impossible particles that contradict all the laws of A)causality B) harmony C) time arrows (energy and information balances), therefore they do not
exist as long as we do not find them in nature, they will be aberrations, monsters, fantasies.

On the other hand real scientists, astronomers favor dark matter to be baryonic, ultra dense, cold matter,, which is made of known-known
Particles, A) Experimentally proved B) logically sound C) whose properties respond to the dark matter of the Universe and so they can only be:
A) cold, dark, ultradense black holes able to gravitationally red shift light at 2.7 K, which are Black holes with the mass of a moon, called MOON MACHOS
B) Certain configurations of strange matter, mainly dibaryon double neutral nuclei and some pentaquark systems

What this means is that 76% of the Universe will be made of the quark-gluon type of liquids and micro black holes CERN will do and so the probability we are extinct by CERN is proportional to the quantity of quark dark matter of the Universe 96%.
CERN therefore certainly will murder us according to the laws of truth of science.
According to science fiction, CCERN will produce Higgs, SUSYs, Axons, neutralinos and as Arkani Hammed say 'dragoons'.
Now for your general enlightenment on these matters www.cerntruth.com
PermalinkPermalink 2010-03-17 | 11:54
Comment from: luis sancho [Visitor] · http://www.cerntruth.com
pd. regarding your comment that we are in a scientific discussion, and so there is no need to use historic assessments or talk about our possible death, you imply that scientists at CERN have the right to murder mankind in a scientific detached manner, without being hold responsible or even inquired about? is this the ethical standing at CERN; the way they respond to the people that pay their bills, when properly inquired? I believe we are in a democracy not in a technocratic tyranny. This is indeed the issue here. CERN has put itself above justice, above mankind, above human rights, above truth, and will not accept any dialog. As John Ellis put it: the issue is not to defend mankind from the LHC but the LHC from mankind. I suggest mankind to wake up before is too late to those menaces. The last time a historic situation like this arouse from a similar factory, we did not act in time.
PermalinkPermalink 2010-03-17 | 12:07
*
* your email address will not be displayed
  your URL will be displayed